Desire in Long-Term Relationships

Many Canadian adults live in a married or common-law union, and many of those couples have been together for years. How sexual desire fares across such long partnerships is a recurring subject for therapists, columnists and researchers, and the answers on offer vary widely.

This article summarizes common themes in the discussion and places them alongside better-known ideas from the wider debate.

The measurement problem

Surveys on marital sexual satisfaction usually ask respondents to rate how happy they are with their sex lives. Critics argue that such questions have no objective yardstick: a person who has never experienced a high level of passion may report contentment because there is nothing to compare against. On that reading, satisfaction scores say little about how much desire a couple actually feels. Researchers in the field do acknowledge that self-reported satisfaction is shaped by expectations, though they also develop other measures.

The evolutionary argument

Some commentators attribute declining desire to biology. The argument is that long monogamy offers fewer reproductive advantages than novelty, so humans may have evolved to lose interest in familiar partners. Some writers add that early human pair bonds may have lasted only a few years, roughly the time needed for a child to pass the most vulnerable stage. Evolutionary explanations of this type are widely debated, and many scholars question how far such claims can be applied to modern marriages with shared mortgages, children and deep affection.

Cultural constraints

Commentators also point to mainstream values that disapprove of sexual activity outside a committed relationship, including consensual non-monogamy such as polyamory and swinging. For couples whose desire has faded, these norms are said to leave few socially accepted outlets. Canadian attitudes toward consensual non-monogamy are mixed, and academic work on the subject continues.

Esther Perel and the role of separateness

The book Mating in Captivity by Esther Perel, a Belgian-born therapist based in New York, is among the most widely discussed works on the topic. Perel's central theme is that eroticism depends on some distance between partners. In her framing, desire needs a gap to cross, while habit and predictability tend to flatten it. Her work contrasts the security that couples seek with the uncertainty that fuels erotic interest, and it has been widely read and discussed since its publication.

Other factors researchers mention

Studies of long-term couples also point to everyday influences on desire, including stress, fatigue, caregiving duties, health conditions, medications and changes in communication. Sexual interest differs between partners, and differences in desire are a common reason couples seek counselling. Researchers generally treat fluctuating desire as normal over a long relationship instead of as a sign of failure.

Taken together, these explanations illustrate two competing views of waning desire, one rooted in biology and one in the psychology of closeness, with practical life circumstances adding a third layer.

Frequently asked questions

Why are satisfaction surveys questioned in this context?

Because respondents rate their satisfaction against their own expectations, a score may not reflect how much desire or variety a couple actually experiences.

What is the central idea of Mating in Captivity?

Esther Perel argues that eroticism relies on a degree of separateness between partners, while routine and predictability tend to reduce desire.

Sources and further reading

Related reading

Updated November 2026. General information only, not medical, legal or professional advice. See the disclaimer and the medical disclaimer.